Sources & research

Advice you can't check is just opinion with confidence. Every number on this site traces back to a named, dated source — here they are, along with the exact figures we take from each.

The research we cite

Pew Research Center

Dating at 50 and up (2023)

The backbone of our numbers on how people over 50 actually experience online dating.

  • 57% / 38%of women vs men over 50 describe online dating as a negative experience (2023)
  • ~50%of users over 50 are looking for a long-term partner (2023)
  • #1Match is the most used platform in the 50+ age group (2023)
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited across our getting-started, women’s and men’s guides.

Bowling Green State Univ. — NCFMR

Singlehood among adults in their 50s (2022)

The population data behind our standing answer to «is there anyone even out there?». Yes — nearly three in ten people in their 50s, and the share climbs with every decade after 60.

  • 29%of adults aged 50–59 are single — neither married nor cohabiting (NCFMR analysis of 2022 Census CPS data)
  • 40%of all U.S. adults 50+ were unmarried in 2020, up from 34% a century earlier (NCFMR, Census/ACS)
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited on the homepage, hubs, and most guides.

The Senior List

Older Singles Dating Study (2024)

A late-2024 survey of older singles — the research twin of what we see in real life.

  • 2024selectivity tracks with satisfaction — mature daters who know what they want report better experiences
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited in our complete guide, women’s guide, and age-gap articles.

Lee & McKinnish, Journal of Population Economics

The Marital Satisfaction of Differently-Aged Couples (2018)

Thirteen years of Australian household panel data — the best evidence we found on whether an age gap actually affects how a couple fares over time.

  • 6–10 yrsthe higher initial satisfaction of differently-aged couples is erased within six to ten years of marriage
  • differently-aged couples are also less resilient to negative economic shocks
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited in our age-gap articles, where it replaced a softer claim we could not support.

David M. Buss, Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences, 37 Cultures (1989)

The canonical cross-cultural study of stated age preferences — 37 samples, 33 countries, 10,047 people. We pair it with Eastwick & Finkel (2008), which found stated ideals fail to predict real attraction after meeting someone.

  • 37samples across 33 countries showing men state a preference for younger partners, women for older
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited in our age-gap articles on stated versus revealed preference.

U.S. Federal Trade Commission

Protecting Older Consumers 2024–2025

The FTC’s annual report to Congress on fraud against older adults. Note what it does not contain: neither the FTC nor the FBI breaks romance-scam victims out by gender, so we do not claim scammers target women specifically.

  • 60+older adults are far more likely than younger adults to report losing money to a romance scam
View the study →Links verified: August 2026

Cited in our online dating safety guidance.

How we read a study before citing it

01

Primary source only

We link the study itself, not an article about an article about it. If we can’t find the original, we don’t cite the number.

02

Date attached, always

A statistic without a year is folklore. Every figure we print carries its source and vintage in the same sentence.

03

Method check

Who was surveyed, how many, and how were they found? A self-selected poll of app users is not a picture of everyone over 50 — and we say so when it matters.

04

Numbers don’t replace judgment

Research tells you the terrain; it doesn’t walk it for you. Where evidence is thin, we write «in our experience» and mean exactly that.

What we refuse to treat as evidence

Found a broken link or a better source?

Research moves; links rot; better studies appear. Tell us at hello@over50romance.com — we'll update within a week and note the change.